Become the practitioner your AI assumes you already are.
Score your AI workflow across seven dimensions. Get the corrections for the gaps costing you the most quality and tokens.
Does your briefing file describe what's unique about your project, rather than general instructions the model already knows?
You're not bad at AI. You're flying blind in it.
The workflow is invisible until it costs you — usage limits hit before lunch, anxious rationing of every prompt, drops in quality blamed on the model. The pattern is the same across every practitioner: the gap isn't the tool, it's the loop around it.
Five-hour cap gone by noon. Weekly limit gone by Wednesday. The same prompts, the same re-explanations, the same mid-session restarts — every cycle eats hours of usage you've already paid for.
The meter becomes the workflow. You ration prompts, second-guess every ask, batch questions you should have asked separately. The tool you bought to think faster is now the thing you're managing instead of using.
You can't tell which habits actually waste tokens versus which just feel wasteful. No feedback loop, no diagnosis, no way to know whether the fix is a better briefing, a shorter session, or a tighter prompt.
“Claude got worse this week” is almost always workflow drift: stale context, runaway sessions, weak briefings. The score separates real model variance from the gaps in how you're using it.
The score names what's actually breaking. The corrections tell you what to change. Start with the assessment above.